A few members of the AMA this month spoke out against that plan, arguing that it amounted to racial discrimination, while others said the AMA's focus on language would alienate patients and inject ideology into medicine. It was "deeply informed" by the "Inclusive Communication" guide that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention published in September, as well as by the AMA's "Strategic Plan to Embed Racial Justice and Advance Health Equity" published in May. The guide is part of an ongoing and controversial effort to institutionalize progressivism as public health's lingua franca. Singer's warning echoes the argument that five black professors in March made in the New England Journal of Medicine, where they described genetic denialism as "a form of naive ‘color blindness'" that would "perpetuate and potentially exacerbate disparities." We’re talking about matters of life and death here." "A lot of conditions"-such as Tay-Sachs, which disproportionately impacts Ashkenazi Jews, and triple-negative breast cancer, which disproportionately affects black women-"vary based on genetics. "Some vulnerability isn't about economic or social marginalization," said Jeff Singer, a general surgeon in Arizona. It could even make them unwilling to screen racial minorities for serious conditions-including many types of cancer-that they are more likely to inherit, on the mistaken belief that genes play no role in racial health disparities. The guidance won't just influence the way doctors talk, these practitioners said, but also what they know and how they treat patients.
The doctors tv word of the day free#
Integrating these ideas into medicine, five professors and practicing doctors told the Washington Free Beacon, would be a catastrophe, resulting in underqualified doctors, missed diagnoses, and unscientific medical school curricula. Those concepts include the ideas that "individualism and meritocracy" are "malignant narratives" that "create harm," that using race as a proxy for genetics "leads directly to racial health inequities," and that medical vulnerability is the "result of socially created processes" rather than biology. 30 released a controversial guide to "advancing health equity" through "language, narrative, and concepts." The Liaison Committee on Medical Education, which accredits all medical schools in North America, is cosponsored by the American Medical Association (AMA) and the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC)-the same groups that on Oct. The two accrediting bodies for American medical schools now say that meritocracy is "malignant" and that race has "no genetic or scientific basis," positions that many doctors worry will lower standards of care and endanger lives by discouraging vital genetic testing.
0 kommentar(er)
